HostUNI vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UNI vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| UNI | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.76 | $0.3436 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $539.21M |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $633.85K |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $10.48M |
| FDV | $8.01B | $831.96M |
| Holders | 382,165 | 100,872 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | — |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~10× the market cap of CRV
- UNI measures ~2.4× the liquidity of CRV
- UNI measures ~8.1× the 24h volume of CRV
- UNI measures ~3.8× the holder count of CRV
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or CRV?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show UNI at 0.00% and CRV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDEUSDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.