HostU vs 79AU — price, size and safety, side by side
U (BNB Chain) vs 79AU (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
U vs 79AU — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| U | 79AU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $5.92 |
| Market cap | $1.55B | — |
| 24h volume | $4.15M DEX | $4.62M DEX |
| Liquidity | $14.28M | $11.01M |
| FDV | $1.07B | $1.20B |
| Holders | 83,996 | 41,285 |
| Age (days) | 35 | 132 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- U measures ~2.0× the holder count of 79AU
- over the shared window U moved +0.04% while 79AU moved −5.36%
What the data says
U
U at 0xce24439f2d9c6a2289f741120fe202248b666666 is United Stables' dollar on BNB Chain — a fiat-backed stablecoin barely 17 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, and already carrying a $1.5 billion asset-wide market cap against a BNB Chain float priced $1.1 billion fully diluted. A billion dollars of supply does not appear quietly; that figure is the story.
Tracked depth reads $14.3 million — workable for the size — on $4.4 million of 24-hour volume, and the index flags what seventeen days always flags: the token is young enough that its track record is still being written. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question.
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $11.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
FAQ
Which is bigger, U or 79AU?
By tracked market cap: U (BNB Chain) measures $1.55B and 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, U or 79AU?
On the contract checks we publish: U (BNB Chain) grades B and 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have U and 79AU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show U at +0.04% and 79AU at −5.36%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.