HostTRUSD vs WM — price, size and safety, side by side
TRUSD (Ethereum) vs WM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
TRUSD vs WM — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| TRUSD | WM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.9998 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $772.33K | $4.05M |
| Liquidity | $5.15M | $5.00M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 25 | 711 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WM measures ~5.2× the 24h volume of TRUSD
What the data says
TRUSD
trUSD is a smaller fiat-backed dollar — the stablecoin of a modest issuer in a field where the top three names control almost everything. The deployment 0xd0580192e98ea6ceb9c7b6191ed2e27560911697 is the Ethereum mint; our August 16, 2026 snapshot reads $5.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing for a small stable is different than for a small token: a stablecoin's entire product is trust — attestations, redemption rails, reserve quality — and scale is how that trust gets battle-tested. trUSD's depth is real but the asset class it competes in is one where the incumbents' attestations have been inspected for years and a minor issuer's haven't.
WM
Wrapped M is M^0's portable institutional dollar — the bridged representation of the M stablecoin, which is itself issued against T-bill collateral under a framework designed for institutional minters. The deployment 0x437cc33344a0b27a429f795ff6b469c72698b291 is the wrapped mint on Ethereum; our August 19, 2026 snapshot reads $5.0 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing: wM is a claim on M, and M is a claim on a collateral book operated under M^0's rules — so the holder sits two layers from the T-bills, one more than a USDC holder does. The design's pitch is interoperability (M is meant to power bespoke stablecoins); the cost is that the custody chain is longer than the marketing implies.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TRUSD or WM?
By tracked market cap: TRUSD (Ethereum) measures — and WM (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TRUSD or WM?
On the contract checks we publish: TRUSD (Ethereum) grades B and WM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TRUSD and WM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show TRUSD at 0.00% and WM at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TRUSD vs RYYTRUSD vs FKBTRUSD vs CRDTRUSD vs RDKWM vs RYYWM vs FKBWM vs CRDWM vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.