HostTQQQX vs GRASS — price, size and safety, side by side
TQQQX (Solana) vs GRASS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
TQQQX vs GRASS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| TQQQX | GRASS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $71.33 | $0.3322 |
| Market cap | $40.22M | $312.89M |
| 24h volume | $11.63K | $78.23K |
| Liquidity | $53.67K | $54.15K |
| FDV | $40.22M | $312.89M |
| Holders | 704 | 380,615 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- GRASS measures ~7.8× the market cap of TQQQX
- GRASS measures ~6.7× the 24h volume of TQQQX
- GRASS measures ~541× the holder count of TQQQX
What the data says
TQQQX
TQQQX is the xStock for TQQQ — a tokenized claim on a 3x daily-leveraged Nasdaq-100 ETF, which makes it the most aggressive instrument in the xStock family. The mint XsjQP3iMAaQ3kQScQKthQpx9ALRbjKAjQtHg6TFomoc is what our scan tracks: $40.2 million market cap, $54 thousand of liquidity and 704 holders as of September 16, 2026.
Two honest warnings stack here. The family one: issuer custody plus after-hours quoting. The product one is bigger: TQQQ resets its leverage daily, so the tokenized claim inherits volatility decay — over choppy multi-week stretches it can underperform naive 3x expectations even when the index ends flat. A tokenized leveraged ETF is a trading instrument, not a hold; the cap figures describe supply, not suitability.
GRASS
GRASS pays people for something they didn't know they could sell: idle internet bandwidth. Users run a browser extension or node, the network routes web-scraping traffic through their residential connections — primarily to gather training data for AI companies — and rewards flow back in tokens. It's one of the cleaner product stories in the DePIN category, and after an October 2024 airdrop to early node-runners, the token at mint Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs reaches roughly $312.9 million of market capitalization across 380,615 holders in HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot.
Structure: freeze authority revoked, so no one can lock holders out of selling; the creator-associated wallet share reads effectively zero; and the mint authority is not fully retired in this snapshot — consistent with a token whose supply still has scheduled distribution ahead of it (rewards, ecosystem, and investor allocations vesting on public timetables). That's the normal shape for a venture-backed network token, and it means future float growth is a calendar fact to price in rather than a surprise to fear.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TQQQX or GRASS?
By tracked market cap: TQQQX (Solana) measures $40.22M and GRASS (Solana) measures $312.89M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TQQQX or GRASS?
On the contract checks we publish: TQQQX (Solana) grades C and GRASS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TQQQX and GRASS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show TQQQX at −1.53% and GRASS at +0.46%.
More comparisons
TQQQX vs RYYTQQQX vs FKBTQQQX vs CRDTQQQX vs RDKGRASS vs RYYGRASS vs FKBGRASS vs CRDGRASS vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.