HostTOS vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
TOS (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
TOS vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| TOS | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00894 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $9.30M | — |
| 24h volume | $92.54K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $185.16K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $9.30M | — |
| Holders | 1,008 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~9,413× the liquidity of TOS
- RDK measures ~31,192× the 24h volume of TOS
- over the shared window TOS moved −38.6% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
TOS
TOS — TokenOS AI — is a Solana AI-narrative token that launched through pump.fun and grew into a mid-cap. The mint HmjCoarLh5duURfJ333DwfFiPyTCgFT35pRSAoP8pump is what our scan tracks: $9.3 million market cap, $185 thousand of liquidity and 1,008 holders as of September 16, 2026.
Two honest notes: AI-agent tokens are the most narrative-driven cohort in the corpus — valuations move on announcements and demo reels more than on shipped product — and the holder count under a thousand is concentrated for a fifteen-million cap, which makes the holder distribution the figure to watch. The liquidity pool is real, which is more than most of this cohort can claim.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TOS or RDK?
By tracked market cap: TOS (Solana) measures $9.30M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TOS or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: TOS (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TOS and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show TOS at −38.6% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TOS vs RYYTOS vs FKBTOS vs CRDTOS vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.