HostTOPENAI vs PYTH — price, size and safety, side by side
TOPENAI (Solana) vs PYTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
TOPENAI vs PYTH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T00:15:22
| TOPENAI | PYTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.56K | $0.08658 |
| Market cap | $716.68K | $580.57M |
| 24h volume | $2.01M DEX | $1.98M DEX |
| Liquidity | $519.36K | $507.53K |
| FDV | $716.68K | $737.23M |
| Holders | 9,673 | 307,239 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PYTH measures ~810× the market cap of TOPENAI
- PYTH measures ~32× the holder count of TOPENAI
- over the shared window TOPENAI moved +78.9% while PYTH moved +61.5%
What the data says
TOPENAI
TOPENAI — T-OpenAI on Solana, mint oPAiAikWTaFj9RYoRFD35ccfwhnMcB3ThgBZRHSkjTZ — is a tokenized private-equity instrument: its linked social is Tessera, a private-markets tokenization venue, and the ~$921 unit price across a tiny ~685-unit supply is the tell of a share-scaled asset rather than a memecoin. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $717 thousand across 9,673 holders.
This is the private-company problem made literal on another chain: OpenAI has no public float, so whatever a "T-OpenAI" token represents is a claim on secondary-market private shares through the issuer's structure — SPV exposure at best, an oracle-tracked synthetic at worst. The distinction between "tokenized SPV interest" and "token that says OpenAI" is the entire product, and it lives in Tessera's legal documentation, not on-chain.
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $580.6 million of market capitalization across 307,239 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $508 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TOPENAI or PYTH?
By tracked market cap: TOPENAI (Solana) measures $716.68K and PYTH (Solana) measures $580.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TOPENAI or PYTH?
On the contract checks we publish: TOPENAI (Solana) grades A and PYTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TOPENAI and PYTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T00:15:22, the measured snapshots show TOPENAI at +78.9% and PYTH at +61.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T00:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.