HostTBTC vs WLD — price, size and safety, side by side
TBTC (Ethereum) vs WLD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
TBTC vs WLD — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| TBTC | WLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $83.41K | $0.5511 |
| Market cap | $348.57M | $2.05B |
| 24h volume | $346.17K | $253.44K |
| Liquidity | $26.61M | $140.93K |
| FDV | $348.57M | $5.51B |
| Holders | 25,225 | 63,635 |
| Age (days) | 871 | — |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~5.9× the market cap of TBTC
- TBTC measures ~189× the liquidity of WLD
- WLD measures ~2.5× the holder count of TBTC
What the data says
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $26.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TBTC or WLD?
By tracked market cap: TBTC (Ethereum) measures $348.57M and WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TBTC or WLD?
On the contract checks we publish: TBTC (Ethereum) grades B and WLD (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TBTC and WLD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show TBTC at 0.00% and WLD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TBTC vs USD1TBTC vs GHOTBTC vs UNITBTC vs FRXUSDWLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.