HostTAG vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
TAG (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
TAG vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| TAG | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005852 | $0.02842 |
| Market cap | $90.84M | $43.87M |
| 24h volume | $1.93M DEX | $6.76M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.27M | $1.16M |
| FDV | $338.25M | $43.87M |
| Holders | 41,394 | 92,257 |
| Age (days) | 634 | 224 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- TAG measures ~2.1× the market cap of 龙虾
- 龙虾 measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of TAG
- 龙虾 measures ~2.2× the holder count of TAG
- over the shared window TAG moved −29.7% while 龙虾 moved −89.0%
What the data says
TAG
TAG at 0x208bf3e7da9639f1eaefa2de78c23396b0682025 — Tagger — is a BNB Chain asset 634 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $90.8 million market cap against a $338.2 million fully-diluted figure on a 405.4 billion supply — barely a quarter of the supply is the priced float.
The book is workable rather than deep: $1.3 million of tracked depth on $1.9 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling above the pool daily. The FDV gap is the structural fact: nearly three-quarters of the supply is still to emit into a float that is already fully priced.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.9 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $1.2 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TAG or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: TAG (BNB Chain) measures $90.84M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $43.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TAG or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: TAG (BNB Chain) grades A and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TAG and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show TAG at −29.7% and 龙虾 at −89.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.