HostSYRUPUSDC vs WIF — price, size and safety, side by side
SYRUPUSDC (Solana) vs WIF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
SYRUPUSDC vs WIF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SYRUPUSDC | WIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.19 | $0.1995 |
| Market cap | $98.76M | $244.95M |
| 24h volume | $481.98K DEX | $1.74M DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.21M | $7.21M |
| FDV | $98.76M | $244.95M |
| Holders | 3,757 | 264,567 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- WIF measures ~2.5× the market cap of SYRUPUSDC
- SYRUPUSDC measures ~1.6× the liquidity of WIF
- WIF measures ~3.6× the 24h volume of SYRUPUSDC
- WIF measures ~70× the holder count of SYRUPUSDC
- over the shared window SYRUPUSDC moved +0.54% while WIF moved −8.67%
What the data says
SYRUPUSDC
Syrup USDC on Solana is Maple Finance's yield-bearing dollar bridged to this chain — the deposit token that earns institutional lending yield while circulating as a stable unit, one of the "your stablecoin pays you" class. The mint AvZZF1YaZDziPY2RCK4oJrRVrbN3mTD9NL24hPeaZeUj is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $11.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: syrupUSDC's yield comes from Maple's lending book — real borrower demand paying real interest, which is a step up from incentive-printed yield — but it means the token's return is only as good as Maple's loan underwriting, and the bridged Solana form adds the bridge's custody between the holder and that book. The A grade covers the Solana contract state; the lending book is an off-chain fact.
WIF
dogwifhat is a picture of a dog wearing a hat, and it is worth being precise about that, because $WIF's entire honest pitch is that there is no other pitch. No roadmap, no utility claims, no yield — just one of the strongest brands the 2023–24 memecoin cycle produced. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, that brand is priced at roughly $245.0 million of market capitalization, spread across 264,567 holders at mint EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm.
For a token with no team promises to audit, the on-chain mechanics are the whole due-diligence surface, and WIF's are clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, and the creator-associated wallet holding a share the snapshot rounds to zero. Nobody can print supply into your position, nobody can freeze your balance mid-exit, and no deployer sits on a stash waiting for your entry. Those are precisely the levers pulled in the launches our obituaries section documents, and their absence is what separates a volatile joke from a trap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SYRUPUSDC or WIF?
By tracked market cap: SYRUPUSDC (Solana) measures $98.76M and WIF (Solana) measures $244.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SYRUPUSDC or WIF?
On the contract checks we publish: SYRUPUSDC (Solana) grades A and WIF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SYRUPUSDC and WIF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SYRUPUSDC at +0.54% and WIF at −8.67%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.