HostSYRUPUSDC vs MON — price, size and safety, side by side
SYRUPUSDC (Solana) vs MON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
SYRUPUSDC vs MON — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SYRUPUSDC | MON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.19 | $0.02334 |
| Market cap | $98.76M | $2.46B |
| 24h volume | $481.98K DEX | $3.74M DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.21M | $1.57M |
| FDV | $98.76M | $2.46B |
| Holders | 3,757 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 323 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MON measures ~25× the market cap of SYRUPUSDC
- SYRUPUSDC measures ~7.1× the liquidity of MON
- MON measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of SYRUPUSDC
- over the shared window SYRUPUSDC moved +0.40% while MON moved +8.77%
What the data says
SYRUPUSDC
Syrup USDC on Solana is Maple Finance's yield-bearing dollar bridged to this chain — the deposit token that earns institutional lending yield while circulating as a stable unit, one of the "your stablecoin pays you" class. The mint AvZZF1YaZDziPY2RCK4oJrRVrbN3mTD9NL24hPeaZeUj is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $11.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: syrupUSDC's yield comes from Maple's lending book — real borrower demand paying real interest, which is a step up from incentive-printed yield — but it means the token's return is only as good as Maple's loan underwriting, and the bridged Solana form adds the bridge's custody between the holder and that book. The A grade covers the Solana contract state; the lending book is an off-chain fact.
MON
This row tracks MON — Monad's native token — under the all-zeroes placeholder 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 that DEX data uses for a chain's native asset. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $1.6 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest definitional note is the same as on ethereum and arbitrum: MON is the chain's native asset, so there is no mint contract to audit — the checks on this page describe the pools it trades against, not the token. What MON is worth is a question about whether Monad's parallel-EVM thesis (Solana-class speed on EVM semantics) wins real orderflow — the row measures the pools, not the thesis.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SYRUPUSDC or MON?
By tracked market cap: SYRUPUSDC (Solana) measures $98.76M and MON (Monad) measures $2.46B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SYRUPUSDC or MON?
On the contract checks we publish: SYRUPUSDC (Solana) grades A and MON (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SYRUPUSDC and MON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SYRUPUSDC at +0.40% and MON at +8.77%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.