HostSYBTC vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
SYBTC (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SYBTC vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SYBTC | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $78.02K | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $787.23K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $855.36K | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 175 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~2,321× the liquidity of SYBTC
- CRD measures ~5,116× the 24h volume of SYBTC
What the data says
SYBTC
SYBTC — syBTC — is a yield-bearing bitcoin token on Ethereum: BTC price exposure wrapped in a structure that accrues yield, with the "sy" prefix the standard marker for yield-bearing wrapper tokens. The contract 0x01a8b61e7b03891a736b5df865e0ef9c511850ad is what our scan tracks: $855 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 8, 2026, priced tracking bitcoin.
The honest ledger for yield-wrapped BTC: your return is BTC price plus whatever strategy the issuer runs underneath — and your risk is that strategy, its counterparties, and the wrapper's smart contracts on top of the price itself. Yield on bitcoin is never free; the question every sy-token holder should be able to answer is where the yield comes from and what happens when that source turns.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SYBTC or CRD?
By tracked market cap: SYBTC (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SYBTC or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: SYBTC (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SYBTC and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SYBTC at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SYBTC vs RYYSYBTC vs FKBSYBTC vs RDKSYBTC vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.