HostSWBERA vs POLLEN — price, size and safety, side by side
SWBERA (Berachain) vs POLLEN (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SWBERA vs POLLEN — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SWBERA | POLLEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2733 | $0.0001645 |
| Market cap | $11.38M | $70.25K |
| 24h volume | $155.53K DEX | $25.72 DEX |
| Liquidity | $24.04K | $11.83K |
| FDV | $11.34M | $119.57K |
| Holders | 13,011 | 17,499 |
| Age (days) | 442 | 558 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SWBERA measures ~162× the market cap of POLLEN
- SWBERA measures ~2.0× the liquidity of POLLEN
- SWBERA measures ~6,048× the 24h volume of POLLEN
- over the shared window SWBERA moved −9.91% while POLLEN moved −45.4%
What the data says
SWBERA
One detail on SWBERA didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SWBERA shows $24.04K of on-chain liquidity, 13,011 wallets holding and an established record at 442 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $24.04K pool against roughly $11.38M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 13,011-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SWBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWBERA or POLLEN?
By tracked market cap: SWBERA (Berachain) measures $11.38M and POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWBERA or POLLEN?
On the contract checks we publish: SWBERA (Berachain) grades B and POLLEN (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWBERA and POLLEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SWBERA at −9.91% and POLLEN at −45.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.