HostSWBERA vs LBGT — price, size and safety, side by side
SWBERA (Berachain) vs LBGT (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SWBERA vs LBGT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SWBERA | LBGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2733 | $0.1906 |
| Market cap | $11.38M | $34.86K |
| 24h volume | $155.53K DEX | $1.41K DEX |
| Liquidity | $24.04K | $6.10K |
| FDV | $11.34M | $34.86K |
| Holders | 13,011 | 16,141 |
| Age (days) | 442 | 591 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- SWBERA measures ~326× the market cap of LBGT
- SWBERA measures ~3.9× the liquidity of LBGT
- SWBERA measures ~110× the 24h volume of LBGT
- over the shared window SWBERA moved −9.91% while LBGT moved +13.1%
What the data says
SWBERA
One detail on SWBERA didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SWBERA shows $24.04K of on-chain liquidity, 13,011 wallets holding and an established record at 442 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $24.04K pool against roughly $11.38M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 13,011-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SWBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
LBGT
The most important thing to know about LBGT is its authority setup. Right now LBGT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LBGT is at D (40/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, LBGT brings deep liquidity of $6.10K, 16,141 wallets holding and an established record at 591 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $6.10K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $34.86K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 16,141-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWBERA or LBGT?
By tracked market cap: SWBERA (Berachain) measures $11.38M and LBGT (Berachain) measures $34.86K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWBERA or LBGT?
On the contract checks we publish: SWBERA (Berachain) grades B and LBGT (Berachain) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWBERA and LBGT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SWBERA at −9.91% and LBGT at +13.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.