HostSUSDC-9 vs INF — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDC-9 (Solana) vs INF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SUSDC-9 vs INF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SUSDC-9 | INF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9997 | $151.77 |
| Market cap | $63.01K | $233.62M |
| 24h volume | $0.2149 DEX | $2.68M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $63.01K | $233.62M |
| Holders | 22,901 | 42,083 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- INF measures ~3,708× the market cap of SUSDC-9
- INF measures ~12,462,826× the 24h volume of SUSDC-9
- INF measures ~1.8× the holder count of SUSDC-9
What the data says
SUSDC-9
SUSDC-9 — "Saber Wrapped USD Coin (9 decimals)" on Solana, mint JEFFSQ3s8T3wKsvp4tnRAsUBW7Cqgnf8ukBZC4C8XBm1 — is a Saber-era remnant: a wrapped-USDC receipt from the legendary Saber AMM, still held across 22,901 wallets and still pegged at $0.9997 in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
A 63k-unit supply at $63 thousand on a 23k file is archaeology: the wrapped token outlived the protocol's prime. Saber was Solana's dominant stable-swap venue through 2021-22; tokens like this are the wrapper layer that era left behind, still circulating years later.
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDC-9 or INF?
By tracked market cap: SUSDC-9 (Solana) measures $63.01K and INF (Solana) measures $233.62M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDC-9 or INF?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDC-9 (Solana) grades A and INF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDC-9 and INF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SUSDC-9 at −0.02% and INF at +1.93%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.