HostSTS vs SHADOW — price, size and safety, side by side
STS (Sonic) vs SHADOW (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
STS vs SHADOW — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| STS | SHADOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06148 | $1.62 |
| Market cap | $4.64M | $1.14M |
| 24h volume | $25.74K DEX | $6.18K DEX |
| Liquidity | $479.59K | $135.74K |
| FDV | $4.64M | $4.60M |
| Holders | 20,463 | 25,045 |
| Age (days) | 641 | 629 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- STS measures ~4.1× the market cap of SHADOW
- STS measures ~3.5× the liquidity of SHADOW
- STS measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of SHADOW
- over the shared window STS moved +26.7% while SHADOW moved +36.3%
What the data says
STS
There's a small gap on this page — STS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the market side, STS brings a $479.59K pool, a holder base of 20,463 and 641 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $4.64M in market cap, the $479.59K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 20,463-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of STS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SHADOW
The most important thing to know about SHADOW is its authority setup. Right now SHADOW's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why SHADOW is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Here's where SHADOW stands today: $135.74K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 25,045 and an established 629-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $135.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.14M cap — depth like that means SHADOW absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 25,045 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SHADOW holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STS or SHADOW?
By tracked market cap: STS (Sonic) measures $4.64M and SHADOW (Sonic) measures $1.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STS or SHADOW?
On the contract checks we publish: STS (Sonic) grades B and SHADOW (Sonic) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STS and SHADOW performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show STS at +26.7% and SHADOW at +36.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.