HostSTREAM vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
STREAM (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
STREAM vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| STREAM | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008131 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $8.13M | — |
| 24h volume | $14.18K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $80.84K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $8.13M | — |
| Holders | 22,929 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~21,558× the liquidity of STREAM
- RDK measures ~203,623× the 24h volume of STREAM
- over the shared window STREAM moved −10.5% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
STREAM
STREAM is the token of Streamflow — Solana's token-distribution infrastructure: the vesting, lockup and airdrop rails that a large share of Solana projects issue through. The mint STREAMribRwybYpMmSYoCsQUdr6MZNXEqHgm7p1gu9M is what our scan tracks: $8.1 million market cap, $81 thousand of liquidity and 22,929 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest thesis is the pick-and-shovel one: Streamflow earns from every project that vestes tokens through it, so the token is a bet on Solana's token-launch economy persisting — exposure to volume of launches rather than to any launch succeeding. The wide holder count likely includes airdrop-era recipients from projects that distribute through its rails, which flatters the distribution figure somewhat.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STREAM or RDK?
By tracked market cap: STREAM (Solana) measures $8.13M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STREAM or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: STREAM (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STREAM and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show STREAM at −10.5% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
STREAM vs RYYSTREAM vs FKBSTREAM vs CRDSTREAM vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.