HostSTONE vs SIS — price, size and safety, side by side
STONE (Scroll) vs SIS (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
STONE vs SIS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| STONE | SIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.61K | $0.01679 |
| Market cap | — | $1.58M |
| 24h volume | $5.33 DEX | $40.37 DEX |
| Liquidity | $29.86K | $5.75K |
| FDV | $1.76M | $7.86K |
| Holders | 50,903 | 9,881 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 1,054 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- STONE measures ~5.2× the liquidity of SIS
- SIS measures ~7.6× the 24h volume of STONE
- STONE measures ~5.2× the holder count of SIS
What the data says
STONE
One thing stands out on STONE, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why STONE is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, STONE brings a $29.86K pool, 50,903 holders and an established record at 904 days as of 2026-10-09. Read $29.86K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 50,903 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created STONE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SIS
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SIS to flag. Right now SIS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Until that changes, SIS stays around 40/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
On the market side, SIS brings $5.75K of on-chain liquidity, 9,881 wallets holding and 1,054 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $5.75K pool against roughly $1.58M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 9,881-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SIS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STONE or SIS?
By tracked market cap: STONE (Scroll) measures — and SIS (Scroll) measures $1.58M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STONE or SIS?
On the contract checks we publish: STONE (Scroll) grades C and SIS (Scroll) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STONE and SIS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show STONE at +1.09% and SIS at +3.36%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.