HostSTONE vs AXLUSDC — price, size and safety, side by side
STONE (Scroll) vs AXLUSDC (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
STONE vs AXLUSDC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| STONE | AXLUSDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.61K | $0.9983 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $5.33 DEX | $42.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $29.86K | $124.62K |
| FDV | $1.76M | $130.38K |
| Holders | 50,903 | 2,524 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 943 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- AXLUSDC measures ~4.2× the liquidity of STONE
- AXLUSDC measures ~8,049× the 24h volume of STONE
- STONE measures ~20× the holder count of AXLUSDC
What the data says
STONE
One thing stands out on STONE, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why STONE is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, STONE brings a $29.86K pool, 50,903 holders and an established record at 904 days as of 2026-10-09. Read $29.86K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 50,903 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created STONE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
AXLUSDC
AXLUSDC has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now AXLUSDC's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, AXLUSDC stays around 47/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where AXLUSDC stands today: $124.62K of on-chain liquidity, 2,524 wallets holding and an established 943-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $124.62K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 2,524 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STONE or AXLUSDC?
By tracked market cap: STONE (Scroll) measures — and AXLUSDC (Blast) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STONE or AXLUSDC?
On the contract checks we publish: STONE (Scroll) grades C and AXLUSDC (Blast) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STONE and AXLUSDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show STONE at +1.09% and AXLUSDC at +2.47%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.