HostSQD vs ZRO — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs ZRO (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SQD vs ZRO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SQD | ZRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02156 | $1.95 |
| Market cap | $37.76M | $815.18M |
| 24h volume | $42.85K DEX | $2.00M DEX |
| Liquidity | $192.69K | $302.91K |
| FDV | $38.30M | $12.41M |
| Holders | 17,087 | 448,955 |
| Age (days) | 824 | 176 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~22× the market cap of SQD
- ZRO measures ~1.6× the liquidity of SQD
- ZRO measures ~47× the 24h volume of SQD
- ZRO measures ~26× the holder count of SQD
- over the shared window SQD moved −22.5% while ZRO moved +58.0%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $37.8 million market cap prices nearly all of the $38.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $192.7 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $815.2 million market cap towers over the $12.4 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $302.9 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or ZRO?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $37.76M and ZRO (Base) measures $815.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or ZRO?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and ZRO (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and ZRO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SQD at −22.5% and ZRO at +58.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.