HostSQD vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SQD vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| SQD | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03036 | $0.3436 |
| Market cap | $39.68M | $539.21M |
| 24h volume | $3.38K | $633.85K |
| Liquidity | $226.13K | $10.48M |
| FDV | $40.29M | $831.96M |
| Holders | 17,095 | 100,872 |
| Age (days) | 809 | — |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~14× the market cap of SQD
- CRV measures ~46× the liquidity of SQD
- CRV measures ~187× the 24h volume of SQD
- CRV measures ~5.9× the holder count of SQD
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or CRV?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M and CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show SQD at 0.00% and CRV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs SQDSQD vs RHEAOPG vs SQDUSDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.