HostSPCXC vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
SPCXC (Base) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SPCXC vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SPCXC | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $150.23 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.25M | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $896.46K | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 11 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~2,517× the liquidity of SPCXC
- RYY measures ~1,068× the 24h volume of SPCXC
What the data says
SPCXC
There's a small gap on this page — SPCXC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-09-14. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On liquidity and holders, SPCXC shows $896.46K of on-chain liquidity and a brand-new record at 11 days as of 2026-09-14. Read $896.46K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SPCXC or RYY?
By tracked market cap: SPCXC (Base) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SPCXC or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: SPCXC (Base) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SPCXC and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SPCXC at 0.00% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SPCXC vs FKBSPCXC vs CRDSPCXC vs RDKSPCXC vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.