Open app

SHX vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

SHX (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

SHXB

$0.003366
Stronghold SHx on Solana
Trade SHX
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

SHX vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
SHX −12.8%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
SHXCRD
Price$0.003366$2.13K
Market cap$98.78K
24h volume$4.81K$4.03B
Liquidity$45.60K$1.99B
FDV$98.78K
Holders56
Age (days)1
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

SHX

Stronghold SHx — the payments/fintech project's token on Solana — at mint EFchnNkBvh4gSY5zqDgqRfuPR7mStBLvKBxPq5JUJcmP. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $46 thousand of liquidity — and the first thing to see is 56 holders.

Fifty-six. Whatever the market cap prints, this is a concentrated instrument: a real-company token whose Solana-side presence is a narrow slice of wallets, meaning the price and the depth are set by a small group. SHx itself is a legitimate project (Stronghold runs actual payment rails), but the on-chain market here is thin enough that it should be read as "exists" rather than "deep."

Full SHX safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, SHX or CRD?

By tracked market cap: SHX (Solana) measures $98.78K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, SHX or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: SHX (Solana) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have SHX and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SHX at −12.8% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

SHX vs RYYSHX vs FKBSHX vs RDKSHX vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.