HostSHRUB vs ZC — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRUB (Ethereum) vs ZC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
SHRUB vs ZC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SHRUB | ZC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001196 | $0.002615 |
| Market cap | $1.21M | $17.94M |
| 24h volume | $5.92M DEX | $4.04M DEX |
| Liquidity | $523.27K | $326.97K |
| FDV | $1.21M | $18.08M |
| Holders | 13,201 | 5,596 |
| Age (days) | 799 | 6 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZC measures ~15× the market cap of SHRUB
- SHRUB measures ~1.6× the liquidity of ZC
- SHRUB measures ~2.4× the holder count of ZC
- over the shared window SHRUB moved +5.07% while ZC moved −86.7%
What the data says
SHRUB
SHRUB on Ethereum — 0x3b991130eae3cca364406d718da22fa1c3e7c256 — is the oldest token in this index slice: 799 days tracked, over two years of continuous market history. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $523 thousand of liquidity against roughly $5.9 million of daily volume.
A 799-day-old memecoin running 11x daily turnover is an unusual combination — age this deep normally settles into quiet books, but SHRUB's pool is being cycled industrially even now. That reads as a community token that kept its market-making relationships alive: the asset survived, and the desks around it stayed. It is also a reminder that "old" and "calm" are not the same property.
ZC
There's a lot to like about how ZC's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason ZC's 90/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
By the numbers, ZC is showing workable liquidity of $326.97K, 5,596 holders and a brand-new record at 6 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $17.94M, the $326.97K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 5,596-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just 0.73% of ZC as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRUB or ZC?
By tracked market cap: SHRUB (Ethereum) measures $1.21M and ZC (Ethereum) measures $17.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRUB or ZC?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRUB (Ethereum) grades B and ZC (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRUB and ZC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SHRUB at +5.07% and ZC at −86.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.