HostSHRUB vs NEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRUB (Ethereum) vs NEAR (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
SHRUB vs NEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SHRUB | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001196 | $5.16 |
| Market cap | $1.21M | $15.74M |
| 24h volume | $5.92M DEX | $995.23K DEX |
| Liquidity | $523.27K | $420.92K |
| FDV | $1.21M | $15.78M |
| Holders | 13,201 | 14,552 |
| Age (days) | 799 | 904 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- NEAR measures ~13× the market cap of SHRUB
- SHRUB measures ~6.0× the 24h volume of NEAR
- over the shared window SHRUB moved −65.8% while NEAR moved +22.9%
What the data says
SHRUB
SHRUB on Ethereum — 0x3b991130eae3cca364406d718da22fa1c3e7c256 — is the oldest token in this index slice: 799 days tracked, over two years of continuous market history. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $523 thousand of liquidity against roughly $5.9 million of daily volume.
A 799-day-old memecoin running 11x daily turnover is an unusual combination — age this deep normally settles into quiet books, but SHRUB's pool is being cycled industrially even now. That reads as a community token that kept its market-making relationships alive: the asset survived, and the desks around it stayed. It is also a reminder that "old" and "calm" are not the same property.
NEAR
NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.
The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRUB or NEAR?
By tracked market cap: SHRUB (Ethereum) measures $1.21M and NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRUB or NEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRUB (Ethereum) grades B and NEAR (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRUB and NEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SHRUB at −65.8% and NEAR at +22.9%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.