HostSHRAMP vs NADS — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRAMP (Monad) vs NADS (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-28.
SHRAMP vs NADS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-28T00:25:52
| SHRAMP | NADS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002545 | $0.00003774 |
| Market cap | $159.06K | $35.08K |
| 24h volume | $984.90 | $90.68 |
| Liquidity | $17.43K | $8.44K |
| FDV | $159.06K | $35.08K |
| Holders | 3,228 | 3,459 |
| Age (days) | 291 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHRAMP measures ~4.5× the market cap of NADS
- SHRAMP measures ~2.1× the liquidity of NADS
- SHRAMP measures ~11× the 24h volume of NADS
- over the shared window SHRAMP moved +60.0% while NADS moved +7.59%
What the data says
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 3,228 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $159.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $17.4 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
NADS
The contract behind NADS is about as reassuring as they come. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's why NADS sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-09-26 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Here's where NADS stands today: a $8.44K pool, a holder base of 3,459 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $8.44K pool stands up well to a ~$35.08K cap — depth like that means NADS absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 3,459 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRAMP or NADS?
By tracked market cap: SHRAMP (Monad) measures $159.06K and NADS (Monad) measures $35.08K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRAMP or NADS?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRAMP (Monad) grades A and NADS (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRAMP and NADS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-28T00:25:52, the measured snapshots show SHRAMP at +60.0% and NADS at +7.59%.
More comparisons
SHRAMP vs LENNYRMDN vs SHRAMPARIA vs SHRAMPSLEAZE vs SHRAMPHELIO vs NADSNADS vs YELPENADS vs HACKERBORGY vs NADS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-28T00:25:52; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.