HostSHFL vs TRUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
SHFL (Ethereum) vs TRUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
SHFL vs TRUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SHFL | TRUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5091 | $0.9991 |
| Market cap | $204.06M | $74.43M |
| 24h volume | $890.51K DEX | $1.50M DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.45M | $4.08M |
| FDV | $384.60M | $74.43M |
| Holders | 8,010 | 486 |
| Age (days) | 937 | 44 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SHFL measures ~2.7× the market cap of TRUSD
- TRUSD measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of SHFL
- SHFL measures ~16× the holder count of TRUSD
- over the shared window SHFL moved +21.7% while TRUSD moved +0.08%
What the data says
SHFL
SHFL passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-10-09, with the structural risks already off the table.
On liquidity and holders, SHFL shows $4.45M of on-chain liquidity, 8,010 holders and an established 937-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $204.06M, the $4.45M pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A 8,010-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SHFL as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
TRUSD
trUSD is a smaller fiat-backed dollar — the stablecoin of a modest issuer in a field where the top three names control almost everything. The deployment 0xd0580192e98ea6ceb9c7b6191ed2e27560911697 is the Ethereum mint; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $4.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing for a small stable is different than for a small token: a stablecoin's entire product is trust — attestations, redemption rails, reserve quality — and scale is how that trust gets battle-tested. trUSD's depth is real but the asset class it competes in is one where the incumbents' attestations have been inspected for years and a minor issuer's haven't.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHFL or TRUSD?
By tracked market cap: SHFL (Ethereum) measures $204.06M and TRUSD (Ethereum) measures $74.43M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHFL or TRUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: SHFL (Ethereum) grades A and TRUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHFL and TRUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SHFL at +21.7% and TRUSD at +0.08%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.