HostSHDW vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
SHDW (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SHDW vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SHDW | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01858 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $3.18M | — |
| 24h volume | $7.67K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $11.38K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $3.18M | — |
| Holders | 72,559 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~174,481× the liquidity of SHDW
- CRD measures ~525,022× the 24h volume of SHDW
- over the shared window SHDW moved −8.09% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
SHDW
SHDW is the Shadow Token — the utility asset of GenesysGo's decentralized storage network on Solana, used to pay for decentralized file storage and to compensate the operators who provide it. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows $3.2 million in market value across 72,559 wallets on mint SHDWyBxihqiCj6YekG2GUr7wqKLeLAMK1gHZck9pL6y.
SHDW is an older, infrastructure-grade Solana asset — it predates the current memecoin cycle and survives on genuine utility demand rather than narrative momentum. That history cuts both ways: real usage is a floor no meme has, but infrastructure tokens carry slow repricing and thin attention.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHDW or CRD?
By tracked market cap: SHDW (Solana) measures $3.18M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHDW or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: SHDW (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHDW and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SHDW at −8.09% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SHDW vs RYYSHDW vs FKBSHDW vs RDKSHDW vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.