HostSHARK vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
SHARK (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
SHARK vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| SHARK | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0006535 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $66.79K | — |
| 24h volume | $266.81 | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $6.47K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $66.79K | — |
| Holders | 70,485 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~261,777× the liquidity of SHARK
- CCV measures ~10,274,436× the 24h volume of SHARK
What the data says
SHARK
SHARK is the token of Sharky, a Solana NFT lending protocol — the asset of a venue where holders borrow against NFTs and lenders earn the interest. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $66.8 thousand in market value across 70,485 wallets on mint SHARKSYJjqaNyxVfrpnBN9pjgkhwDhatnMyicWPnr1s.
The split this page wants you to notice is severe: seventy thousand wallets against a five-figure capitalization is an airdrop-shaped distribution — huge reach, almost no economic weight behind it. That is not a verdict on the protocol; it is a statement that the token is currently priced like a souvenir of it.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHARK or CCV?
By tracked market cap: SHARK (Solana) measures $66.79K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHARK or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: SHARK (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHARK and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show SHARK at +1.63% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SHARK vs RYYSHARK vs FKBSHARK vs CRDSHARK vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.