HostSHADOW vs WBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
SHADOW (Sonic) vs WBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
SHADOW vs WBTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SHADOW | WBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.62 | $81.15K |
| Market cap | $1.14M | $9.63B |
| 24h volume | $6.18K DEX | $185.99M DEX |
| Liquidity | $135.74K | $220.70M |
| FDV | $4.60M | $9.63B |
| Holders | 25,045 | 197,266 |
| Age (days) | 629 | 1,583 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~8,417× the market cap of SHADOW
- WBTC measures ~1,626× the liquidity of SHADOW
- WBTC measures ~30,087× the 24h volume of SHADOW
- WBTC measures ~7.9× the holder count of SHADOW
- over the shared window SHADOW moved +36.3% while WBTC moved −1.40%
What the data says
SHADOW
The most important thing to know about SHADOW is its authority setup. Right now SHADOW's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why SHADOW is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Here's where SHADOW stands today: $135.74K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 25,045 and an established 629-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $135.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.14M cap — depth like that means SHADOW absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 25,045 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SHADOW holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHADOW or WBTC?
By tracked market cap: SHADOW (Sonic) measures $1.14M and WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHADOW or WBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: SHADOW (Sonic) grades C and WBTC (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHADOW and WBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SHADOW at +36.3% and WBTC at −1.40%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.