HostSHADOW vs FIVE — price, size and safety, side by side
SHADOW (Sonic) vs FIVE (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
SHADOW vs FIVE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SHADOW | FIVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.62 | $0.0002623 |
| Market cap | $1.14M | $300.88K |
| 24h volume | $6.18K DEX | $2.32K DEX |
| Liquidity | $135.74K | $35.33K |
| FDV | $4.60M | $427.45K |
| Holders | 25,045 | 7,567 |
| Age (days) | 629 | 589 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- SHADOW measures ~3.8× the market cap of FIVE
- SHADOW measures ~3.8× the liquidity of FIVE
- SHADOW measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of FIVE
- SHADOW measures ~3.3× the holder count of FIVE
- over the shared window SHADOW moved +36.3% while FIVE moved +4.72%
What the data says
SHADOW
The most important thing to know about SHADOW is its authority setup. Right now SHADOW's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why SHADOW is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Here's where SHADOW stands today: $135.74K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 25,045 and an established 629-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $135.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.14M cap — depth like that means SHADOW absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 25,045 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SHADOW holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHADOW or FIVE?
By tracked market cap: SHADOW (Sonic) measures $1.14M and FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHADOW or FIVE?
On the contract checks we publish: SHADOW (Sonic) grades C and FIVE (Sonic) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHADOW and FIVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SHADOW at +36.3% and FIVE at +4.72%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.