HostSDOLA vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
SDOLA (Ethereum) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SDOLA vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SDOLA | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.40 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.60M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $2.13M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 646 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~1,026× the liquidity of SDOLA
- FKB measures ~1,533× the 24h volume of SDOLA
What the data says
SDOLA
sDOLA is staked DOLA — Inverse Finance's yield-bearing version of its DOLA stablecoin, where the yield comes from the protocol's own lending revenue routed back to stakers. The deployment 0xb45ad160634c528cc3d2926d9807104fa3157305 is the mint; our August 17, 2026 snapshot reads $2.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: sDOLA's return is Inverse's actual lending spread — real borrower demand paying real interest through the FiRM market — which makes it a genuinely productive asset rather than incentive-printed yield. The trade-off is the usual one for a protocol-revenue stable: the return is only as good as Inverse's loan book and its stablecoin's peg machinery, both smaller than the majors'.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SDOLA or FKB?
By tracked market cap: SDOLA (Ethereum) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SDOLA or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: SDOLA (Ethereum) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SDOLA and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SDOLA at 0.00% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SDOLA vs RYYSDOLA vs CRDSDOLA vs RDKSDOLA vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.