HostSDAI vs WBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
SDAI (Gnosis) vs WBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SDAI vs WBTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SDAI | WBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.26 | $81.15K |
| Market cap | $42.01M | $9.63B |
| 24h volume | $260.69K DEX | $185.99M DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.93M | $220.70M |
| FDV | $41.95M | $9.63B |
| Holders | 25,480 | 197,266 |
| Age (days) | 151 | 1,583 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~229× the market cap of SDAI
- WBTC measures ~45× the liquidity of SDAI
- WBTC measures ~713× the 24h volume of SDAI
- WBTC measures ~7.7× the holder count of SDAI
What the data says
SDAI
SDAI clears the most important contract test cleanly. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. That leaves SDAI at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On the trading data, SDAI shows $4.93M of on-chain liquidity, 25,480 wallets holding and a maturing record at 151 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.93M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $42.01M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 25,480 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SDAI or WBTC?
By tracked market cap: SDAI (Gnosis) measures $42.01M and WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SDAI or WBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: SDAI (Gnosis) grades A and WBTC (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SDAI and WBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SDAI at +0.34% and WBTC at −2.13%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.