HostSDAI vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
SDAI (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SDAI vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SDAI | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.18 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.78M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $5.42M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 932 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~322× the liquidity of SDAI
- RDK measures ~1,621× the 24h volume of SDAI
What the data says
SDAI
sDAI is Savings Dai — DAI locked in Maker's DAI Savings Rate contract and returned as a share that appreciates against the stablecoin it wraps, DeFi's oldest "your dollar pays you" mechanism. The deployment 0x83f20f44975d03b1b09e64809b757c47f942beea is the canonical mint; our September 8, 2026 snapshot reads $5.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: sDAI's yield is Maker protocol revenue — real lending income distributed to savers, which is why the DSR survived when incentive-printed yields didn't — but the rate is governance-set, so the "savings rate" can be and has been dialed to near-zero when the DAO wanted it there. It is a policy rate, not a market one.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SDAI or RDK?
By tracked market cap: SDAI (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SDAI or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: SDAI (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SDAI and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SDAI at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SDAI vs RYYSDAI vs FKBSDAI vs CRDSDAI vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.