HostSCUSD vs X33 — price, size and safety, side by side
SCUSD (Sonic) vs X33 (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
SCUSD vs X33 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SCUSD | X33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9943 | $4.36 |
| Market cap | $1.92M | $1.11M |
| 24h volume | $5.35K DEX | $10.36K DEX |
| Liquidity | $93.38K | $64.17K |
| FDV | $643.69K | $1.11M |
| Holders | 9,491 | 7,538 |
| Age (days) | 626 | 613 |
| Safety grade | E | A |
Where they differ
- SCUSD measures ~1.7× the market cap of X33
- X33 measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of SCUSD
- over the shared window SCUSD moved −0.64% while X33 moved +38.8%
What the data says
SCUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SCUSD to flag. Right now SCUSD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. That's what's holding the score at 39/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where SCUSD stands today: a $93.38K pool, 9,491 wallets holding and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $93.38K pool against a ~$1.92M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 9,491 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SCUSD as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
X33
X33 gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts X33 at 92/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, X33 is showing $64.17K of on-chain liquidity, 7,538 holders and an established 613-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $64.17K pool stands up well to a ~$1.11M cap — depth like that means X33 absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 7,538 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SCUSD or X33?
By tracked market cap: SCUSD (Sonic) measures $1.92M and X33 (Sonic) measures $1.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SCUSD or X33?
On the contract checks we publish: SCUSD (Sonic) grades E and X33 (Sonic) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SCUSD and X33 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SCUSD at −0.64% and X33 at +38.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.