HostSC vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
SC (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SC vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SC | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001248 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $1.23M | — |
| 24h volume | $4.64K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $188.81K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $1.23M | — |
| Holders | 21,303 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~9,230× the liquidity of SC
- RDK measures ~622,148× the 24h volume of SC
- over the shared window SC moved −14.6% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
SC
Shark Cat — SC — is one of the older-surviving Solana cat memes, a 2024-vintage community token at mint 6D7NaB2xsLd7cauWu1wKk6KBsJohJmP2qZH9GEfVi5Ui. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $189 thousand of liquidity, a market cap near $1 million, and roughly 21,303 holders.
By meme standards that's a mature profile: 21k holders is real distribution, a $187k pool is real liquidity, and surviving multiple cycles is the closest thing a meme has to a track record. Shark Cat's peak was a 2024 headline moment (a celebrity-tweet-adjacent run that put it briefly in the billion-dollar conversation) — what remains is the resilient rump of a community that kept the ticker alive.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SC or RDK?
By tracked market cap: SC (Solana) measures $1.23M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SC or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: SC (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SC and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SC at −14.6% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SC vs RYYSC vs FKBSC vs CRDSC vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.