HostRTX vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
RTX (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
RTX vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| RTX | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6548 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $32.59M | — |
| 24h volume | $33.87 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $186.81 | $1.99B |
| FDV | $32.59M | — |
| Holders | 3,375 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~10,626,317× the liquidity of RTX
- CRD measures ~118,928,331× the 24h volume of RTX
- over the shared window RTX moved −8.33% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
RTX
RTX is the token of RateX — a Solana yield-trading protocol that splits yield-bearing positions into principal and yield components for fixed-rate and leveraged-yield strategies. The mint J1wnHdKvP34fg7TtYdX63UPJMTdXNzJGEqfNJB22vKjU is what our scan tracks: $32.6 million market cap on $187 of liquidity with 3,375 holders as of September 16, 2026.
Read the liquidity figure twice: one hundred eighty dollars of pool depth under a thirty-two-million cap is an exit door that is functionally painted on. The printed cap is supply-times-price arithmetic — not money that could leave — and the grade-A scan score reflects safety checks, not market depth. Also worth untangling: RTX here is RateX, a Solana protocol — not RTX Corporation and not an NVIDIA product.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RTX or CRD?
By tracked market cap: RTX (Solana) measures $32.59M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RTX or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: RTX (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RTX and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show RTX at −8.33% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RTX vs RYYRTX vs FKBRTX vs RDKRTX vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.