Open app

RTR vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

RTR (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

RTRA

$0.0002635
Restore The Republic on Solana
Trade RTR
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

RTR vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
RTR −2.89%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
RTRCRD
Price$0.0002635$2.13K
Market cap$229.07K
24h volume$4.03B
Liquidity$201.06K$1.99B
FDV$229.07K
Holders5,066
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

RTR

RTR passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its authority setup. The mint power is gone, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and with freeze also off, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (92/100, 2026-09-16) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.

By the numbers, RTR is showing $201.06K of on-chain liquidity and 5,066 holders as of 2026-09-16. The $201.06K pool stands up well to a ~$229.07K cap — depth like that means RTR absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 5,066 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — 0.04% of supply as of 2026-09-16, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.

Full RTR safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, RTR or CRD?

By tracked market cap: RTR (Solana) measures $229.07K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, RTR or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: RTR (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have RTR and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show RTR at −2.89% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

RTR vs RYYRTR vs FKBRTR vs RDKRTR vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.