HostRLUSD vs TBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
RLUSD (Ethereum) vs TBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
RLUSD vs TBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| RLUSD | TBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9995 | $82.91K |
| Market cap | $2.47B | $358.59M |
| 24h volume | $10.01M DEX | $1.05M DEX |
| Liquidity | $38.09M | $26.99M |
| FDV | $1.30B | $358.59M |
| Holders | 12,684 | 25,280 |
| Age (days) | 70 | 886 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RLUSD measures ~6.9× the market cap of TBTC
- RLUSD measures ~9.5× the 24h volume of TBTC
- TBTC measures ~2.0× the holder count of RLUSD
- over the shared window RLUSD moved +0.34% while TBTC moved +6.55%
What the data says
RLUSD
RLUSD is Ripple's dollar — the stablecoin Ripple built on its institutional distribution, aimed at the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD but arriving with an exchange network behind it. The deployment 0x8292bb45bf1ee4d140127049757c2e0ff06317ed is the Ethereum mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $38.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: RLUSD's reserve is the standard fiat-backed structure — cash and equivalents with attestations — so its risk profile is issuer-shaped (Ripple's solvency, NYDFS oversight, redemption terms) rather than exotic. What distinguishes it is distribution: Ripple's existing payment rails give it corridor utility most new stablecoins lack, though on pure DeFi depth it still trails the majors by an order of magnitude.
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $27.0 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RLUSD or TBTC?
By tracked market cap: RLUSD (Ethereum) measures $2.47B and TBTC (Ethereum) measures $358.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RLUSD or TBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: RLUSD (Ethereum) grades B and TBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RLUSD and TBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show RLUSD at +0.34% and TBTC at +6.55%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.