HostREUSD vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
REUSD (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
REUSD vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| REUSD | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.10 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.75M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $24.97M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 186 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~70× the liquidity of REUSD
- RDK measures ~770× the 24h volume of REUSD
What the data says
REUSD
This is the deposit-token sibling of Resupply USD — the reUSD issuance represented as a protocol deposit receipt at 0x5086bf358635b81d8c47c66d1c8b9e567db70c72, a separate contract from the Resupply USD stablecoin proper (0x57ab…, which lives on its own page in this index). Our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $25.0 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note is the same one this index keeps returning to on sibling rows: two tokens sharing a brand is normal — receipts, wrappers, bridged mints — and the address, never the ticker, is what tells them apart. What a deposit token adds is a claim layer: the holder is one contract further from the underlying collateral than a holder of the stablecoin itself.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, REUSD or RDK?
By tracked market cap: REUSD (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, REUSD or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: REUSD (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have REUSD and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show REUSD at −0.30% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
REUSD vs RYYREUSD vs FKBREUSD vs CRDREUSD vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.