HostREUSD vs LBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
REUSD (Ethereum) vs LBTC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-06 / 2026-10-06.
REUSD vs LBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-06T21:12:16
| REUSD | LBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9972 | $85.77K |
| Market cap | $46.87M | $8.61M |
| 24h volume | $1.79M DEX | $25.53K DEX |
| Liquidity | $13.13M | $3.36M |
| FDV | $46.87M | $8.61M |
| Holders | 448 | 472 |
| Age (days) | 543 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- REUSD measures ~5.4× the market cap of LBTC
- REUSD measures ~3.9× the liquidity of LBTC
- REUSD measures ~70× the 24h volume of LBTC
- over the shared window REUSD moved −9.38% while LBTC moved +8.40%
What the data says
REUSD
Resupply USD is the stablecoin Resupply Finance mints against Curve/Convex positions — a lending-market stable that routes its yield back to holders through the protocol's own machinery rather than a central custodian. The deployment 0x57ab1e0003f623289cd798b1824be09a793e4bec sits alongside its sibling reUSD issuance in this index; the October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $13 million of tracked pool liquidity across the pair set.
The honest shape: an overcollateralized DeFi stable trades the stablecoin trilemma directly — its peg quality is a function of the collateral book and the liquidation engine, both verifiable on-chain but neither guaranteed. What Resupply buys with that complexity is yield generation that doesn't route through an issuer's P&L.
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked Bitcoin — the liquid-staking token that puts BTC to work in Babylon's staking layer while circulating as a DeFi-usable claim, one of the "productive BTC" class that grew out of Babylon's launch. The mint LBTCgU4b3wsFKsPwBn1rRZDx5DoFutM6RPiEt1TPDsY is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $3.4 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: LBTC is a claim on BTC that's been restaked into Babylon's security model — the yield is Babylon's protocol paying for its security budget, which means the return is emissions-shaped (real but endogenous to the system) rather than external revenue. The custody chain is Lombard's consortium model; on Solana, add the bridge that carried it here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, REUSD or LBTC?
By tracked market cap: REUSD (Ethereum) measures $46.87M and LBTC (Solana) measures $8.61M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, REUSD or LBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: REUSD (Ethereum) grades C and LBTC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have REUSD and LBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-06T21:12:16, the measured snapshots show REUSD at −9.38% and LBTC at +8.40%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-06T21:12:16; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.