HostRDNT vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs GRT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
RDNT vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| RDNT | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004636 | $0.02869 |
| Market cap | $688.76K | $313.95M |
| 24h volume | $1.39K | $22.25K |
| Liquidity | $61.05K | $128.33K |
| FDV | $459.55K | $309.90M |
| Holders | 101,322 | 171,927 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~456× the market cap of RDNT
- GRT measures ~2.1× the liquidity of RDNT
- GRT measures ~16× the 24h volume of RDNT
- GRT measures ~1.7× the holder count of RDNT
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or GRT?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K and GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and GRT (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show RDNT at 0.00% and GRT at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKOFRAX vs GRTGRT vs RFCGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.