HostQQQX vs SOLO — price, size and safety, side by side
QQQX (Solana) vs SOLO (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
QQQX vs SOLO — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| QQQX | SOLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $709.03 | $0.7586 |
| Market cap | $62.91M | $9.50M |
| 24h volume | $1.70M DEX | $129.30K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.13M | $1.96M |
| FDV | $62.91M | $23.28M |
| Holders | 38,334 | 3,228 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- QQQX measures ~6.6× the market cap of SOLO
- QQQX measures ~13× the 24h volume of SOLO
- QQQX measures ~12× the holder count of SOLO
- over the shared window QQQX moved −1.22% while SOLO moved +14.8%
What the data says
QQQX
QQQX is a tokenized Nasdaq-100 — one of Backed Finance's xStocks, designed to track the index ETF on-chain. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $62.9 million across 38,334 wallets on mint Xs8S1uUs1zvS2p7iwtsG3b6fkhpvmwz4GYU3gWAmWHZ.
The same custodial trust model as every xStock: the issuer holds the index exposure off-chain, and the token delivers its price — not the ETF's rights or its dividend machinery. For Nasdaq exposure inside Solana DeFi, that tradeoff is the entire product.
SOLO
SOLO (Solomon) is a small-cap Solana token launched through MetaDAO's futarchy launchpad — the "meta"-suffixed mint SoLo9oxzLDpcq1dpqAgMwgce5WqkRDtNXK7EPnbmeta is the launchpad's signature, meaning its issuance and treasury sit under futarchy governance rather than a founder's multisig. Our October 6, 2026 read shows $9.5 million market cap ($23.3 million fully diluted) against $2.0 million of pool liquidity and 3,228 holders.
The honest note: the market-cap-to-FDV gap — over half the supply isn't circulating — is the thing to watch at this size, and futarchy-governed treasuries are a real governance experiment, not a marketing one. A small float under a launchpad structure means the unlock schedule is the chart.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QQQX or SOLO?
By tracked market cap: QQQX (Solana) measures $62.91M and SOLO (Solana) measures $9.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QQQX or SOLO?
On the contract checks we publish: QQQX (Solana) grades A and SOLO (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QQQX and SOLO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show QQQX at −1.22% and SOLO at +14.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.