HostPSOL vs INF — price, size and safety, side by side
PSOL (Solana) vs INF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
PSOL vs INF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| PSOL | INF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $114.99 | $151.77 |
| Market cap | $192.47M | $233.62M |
| 24h volume | $871.98K DEX | $2.68M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $192.47M | $233.62M |
| Holders | 114,519 | 42,083 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- INF measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of PSOL
- PSOL measures ~2.7× the holder count of INF
What the data says
PSOL
pSOL is what happens when the stake button lives inside the wallet everyone already uses. Phantom — the default wallet of a huge share of Solana users — put one-tap staking in front of its user base, and pSOL, at mint pSo1f9nQXWgXibFtKf7NWYxb5enAM4qfP6UJSiXRQfL, is the receipt. The distribution shows it: 114,519 holders as of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, third-most of any liquid staking token this site tracks, across roughly $192.5 million of stake — an average position measured in hundreds of dollars, not hundreds of thousands. This is the retail LST.
That consumer profile is pSOL's most meaningful safety property, in both directions. Positively: ownership this dispersed can't be destabilized by any single exit, and Phantom's incentive to keep its in-wallet product boring and reliable is existential — a staking scandal inside the wallet would cost far more than the product earns. The trade-off: many pSOL holders tapped a button without learning what a liquid staking token is, so it's worth saying plainly — pSOL's price floats against SOL, can dip below backing in stressed markets, and full redemption runs on staking timelines, not instantly.
INF
INF is a different animal from the other staked-SOL tokens on this site: it's the pool of pools. Sanctum's Infinity holds a basket of many liquid staking tokens at once, and INF — mint 5oVNBeEEQvYi1cX3ir8Dx5n1P7pdxydbGF2X4TxVusJm — represents a share of that basket, earning both the underlying staking yield and trading fees whenever anyone swaps one LST for another through the pool. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values it at roughly $233.6 million across 42,083 holders — a genuinely broad base for a product this structurally wonky.
The appeal is diversification where the LST field is most fragmented: instead of picking whether jupSOL or hSOL or bSOL wins, INF holds the field and clips fees from its churn. The cost is a second layer of moving parts. A vanilla LST asks you to trust one stake pool program; INF asks you to trust Sanctum's multi-pool machinery plus every constituent LST inside it — a stress event in any large member token transmits into the basket that contains it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PSOL or INF?
By tracked market cap: PSOL (Solana) measures $192.47M and INF (Solana) measures $233.62M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PSOL or INF?
On the contract checks we publish: PSOL (Solana) grades A and INF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PSOL and INF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show PSOL at +1.97% and INF at +1.93%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.