HostPROS vs MUC — price, size and safety, side by side
PROS (Base) vs MUC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
PROS vs MUC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| PROS | MUC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5889 | $874.83 |
| Market cap | $2.69M | $959.97K |
| 24h volume | $2.59M DEX | $5.43M DEX |
| Liquidity | $570.37K | $498.38K |
| FDV | $2.68M | $946.79K |
| Holders | 3,967 | — |
| Age (days) | 149 | 14 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- PROS measures ~2.8× the market cap of MUC
- MUC measures ~2.1× the 24h volume of PROS
What the data says
PROS
PROS — Wrapped PROS on Base, 0x8b7dde054be9d180c1be7fae0874697374a49832 — is the wrapped form of a token with a real home elsewhere: PROS is the Prosper/Prosper-predict ecosystem token, and a wrapped ERC-20 on Base is the cross-chain form of it. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $570 thousand of liquidity and roughly $2.7 million of daily volume.
A wrapped token's risk model differs from a native one: the honest questions are which bridge or custodian mints the wrapper, whether the canonical contract is the one at this address, and what the redemption path back to the native asset looks like. $0.44 per token across 103 days of tracked age describes a wrapper with a sustained market — the depth to trade, and the standing caveat that wrapper integrity is only as good as its bridge.
MUC
There's a small gap on this page — MUC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, MUC shows deep liquidity of $498.38K and a brand-new 14-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $959.97K in market cap, the $498.38K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PROS or MUC?
By tracked market cap: PROS (Base) measures $2.69M and MUC (Base) measures $959.97K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PROS or MUC?
On the contract checks we publish: PROS (Base) grades B and MUC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PROS and MUC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show PROS at −13.8% and MUC at −18.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.