HostPORTAL vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
PORTAL (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
PORTAL vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PORTAL | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008933 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $7.94K | $57.95M |
| 24h volume | $0.002057 | $1.09M |
| Liquidity | $3.81 | — |
| FDV | $7.94K | $57.95M |
| Holders | 465 | 3,816 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- JUICED measures ~7,297× the market cap of PORTAL
- JUICED measures ~527,934,386× the 24h volume of PORTAL
- JUICED measures ~8.2× the holder count of PORTAL
- over the shared window PORTAL moved +134% while JUICED moved +0.13%
What the data says
PORTAL
One detail on PORTAL didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-16 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, PORTAL is showing thin liquidity of $4 and 465 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. Set the $4 pool against roughly $7.94K in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 465-wallet base is small, which usually means concentration risk runs higher; treat it as an early-stage signal and trade accordingly.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: roughly $57.9 million of represented value held by 3,816 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PORTAL or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: PORTAL (Solana) measures $7.94K and JUICED (Solana) measures $57.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PORTAL or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: PORTAL (Solana) grades B and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PORTAL and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PORTAL at +134% and JUICED at +0.13%.
More comparisons
PORTAL vs RYYPORTAL vs FKBPORTAL vs CRDPORTAL vs RDKJUICED vs RYYJUICED vs FKBJUICED vs CRDJUICED vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.