Open app

POOLS vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side

POOLS (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-28.

POOLSB

$0.0001002
POOLS on Base
Trade POOLS
vs

牛来B

$0.0001019
牛来 on Base
Trade 牛来

POOLS vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-28

100 — shared start
POOLS 0.00%  ·  牛来 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
POOLS牛来
Price$0.0001002$0.0001019
Market cap——
24h volume$9.15M DEX$27.03M DEX
Liquidity$5.19$0.000005522
FDV$10.02M$10.19M
Holders4,4775,089
Age (days)01
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

POOLS

POOLS on Base — 0x350131e02222326439bdbb866d05441732b49b07 — is a name that describes its own plumbing: a token called POOLS trading in pools. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5 of liquidity and roughly $9.2 million of daily volume.

At ~9.6x daily turnover, POOLS sits in the hot middle of the Base cohort — above organic-holder flow, below the mirrored-clone extremes. No age figure, holder data, or project information accompanies the row; the sub-cent price and the pool depth describe a momentum instrument doing exactly what its name implies — being traded in and out of liquidity.

牛来

牛来 on Base — 0x688bd92e92a44ae7ad75016506b053fe5cfa8b07 — is one of three contracts this index tracks sharing the same Chinese name (roughly "the bull is coming"). This address carries the deepest of the three: $0.0 of liquidity in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.

The family resemblance is the story. Three tokens, one name, one chain, all priced within a fraction of a cent of each other at ~$0.0001, all cycling ~$26 million of daily volume — near-identical metrics across distinct contracts is the signature of a coordinated deployment or shared market-making arrangement, not three independent projects that happened to converge. The address above is the only identity; a buyer chasing "the" 牛来 by name alone has a one-in-three chance of landing on a different contract.

FAQ

Which is bigger, POOLS or 牛来?

By tracked market cap: POOLS (Base) measures — and 牛来 (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, POOLS or 牛来?

On the contract checks we publish: POOLS (Base) grades B and 牛来 (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have POOLS and 牛来 performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-28, the measured snapshots show POOLS at 0.00% and 牛来 at 0.00%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-28; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.