HostPOLLEN vs YEET — price, size and safety, side by side
POLLEN (Berachain) vs YEET (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
POLLEN vs YEET — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| POLLEN | YEET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001645 | $0.00003095 |
| Market cap | $70.25K | $27.65K |
| 24h volume | $25.72 DEX | $35.56 DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.83K | $4.54K |
| FDV | $119.57K | $33.13K |
| Holders | 17,499 | 20,240 |
| Age (days) | 558 | 606 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- POLLEN measures ~2.5× the market cap of YEET
- POLLEN measures ~2.6× the liquidity of YEET
- over the shared window POLLEN moved −45.4% while YEET moved −21.5%
What the data says
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
YEET
YEET's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why YEET earns a A (85/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, YEET brings $4.54K of on-chain liquidity, 20,240 wallets holding and 606 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.54K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $27.65K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 20,240-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created YEET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POLLEN or YEET?
By tracked market cap: POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K and YEET (Berachain) measures $27.65K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POLLEN or YEET?
On the contract checks we publish: POLLEN (Berachain) grades A and YEET (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POLLEN and YEET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show POLLEN at −45.4% and YEET at −21.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.