HostPOLLEN vs EWBERA-4 — price, size and safety, side by side
POLLEN (Berachain) vs EWBERA-4 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
POLLEN vs EWBERA-4 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| POLLEN | EWBERA-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001645 | $0.3062 |
| Market cap | $70.25K | — |
| 24h volume | $25.72 DEX | $5.57K DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.83K | $1.42K |
| FDV | $119.57K | $445.89K |
| Holders | 17,499 | 7,799 |
| Age (days) | 558 | 508 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- POLLEN measures ~8.3× the liquidity of EWBERA-4
- EWBERA-4 measures ~217× the 24h volume of POLLEN
- POLLEN measures ~2.2× the holder count of EWBERA-4
- over the shared window POLLEN moved −45.4% while EWBERA-4 moved −11.8%
What the data says
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
EWBERA-4
There's a small gap on this page — EWBERA-4's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, EWBERA-4 carries a $1.42K pool, 7,799 wallets holding and 508 days old as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $1.42K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 7,799-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POLLEN or EWBERA-4?
By tracked market cap: POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POLLEN or EWBERA-4?
On the contract checks we publish: POLLEN (Berachain) grades A and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POLLEN and EWBERA-4 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show POLLEN at −45.4% and EWBERA-4 at −11.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.