POKE6900 (Solana) vs LABZ (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-28.
| POKE6900 | LABZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000595 | $0.0005567 |
| Market cap | $53.58K | $27.67K |
| 24h volume | $480.04 | $32.72 |
| Liquidity | $20.31K | $20.29K |
| FDV | $53.58K | $27.67K |
| Holders | 3,197 | 5,991 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
POKE6900 on Solana, mint 3oQwNvAfZMuPWjVPC12ukY7RPA9JiGwLod6Pr4Lkpump — is a pump.fun Pokémon-parody file (in the SPX6900 naming style), holding 3,197 wallets on a $53.6 thousand cap.
Mint and freeze are both revoked; the snapshot reads −9.2% on ~$1.4 thousand of volume.
LABZ — "Insane Labz" on Solana, mint 4VC7UYqBo9Siw8ZnkPXfw9D3dzYCiVrPDzs9XRtyRJMH — is a a Solana launch file, holding 5,991 wallets on a $27.7 thousand cap.
Mint and freeze are both revoked on a $16.5 thousand pool.
By tracked market cap: POKE6900 (Solana) measures $53.58K and LABZ (Solana) measures $27.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
On the contract checks we publish: POKE6900 (Solana) grades A and LABZ (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-28T00:25:52, the measured snapshots show POKE6900 at +18.2% and LABZ at +14.3%.
POKE6900 vs 霞POKE6900 vs AICMPPOKE6900 vs POWSCHEPOKE6900 vs GUNLABZ vs POWSCHEAICMP vs LABZLABZ vs GUN霞 vs LABZ
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-28T00:25:52; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.