HostPNK vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
PNK (Gnosis) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
PNK vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| PNK | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008184 | $12.27 |
| Market cap | $7.52M | $9.53B |
| 24h volume | $1.87K DEX | $1.95M DEX |
| Liquidity | $66.78K | $19.94M |
| FDV | $669.02K | $12.74B |
| Holders | 4,334 | 922,570 |
| Age (days) | 1,686 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~1,268× the market cap of PNK
- LINK measures ~299× the liquidity of PNK
- LINK measures ~1,038× the 24h volume of PNK
- LINK measures ~213× the holder count of PNK
What the data says
PNK
One detail on PNK didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the trading data, PNK shows $66.78K of on-chain liquidity, 4,334 wallets holding and 1,686 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $66.78K pool against roughly $7.52M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 4,334-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of PNK as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $19.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PNK or LINK?
By tracked market cap: PNK (Gnosis) measures $7.52M and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.53B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PNK or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: PNK (Gnosis) grades B and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PNK and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show PNK at −0.33% and LINK at −3.68%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.